LinkedIn Hash

Technical details, regex signatures, and cracking commands for the LinkedIn algorithm.

Regex Identification Signature:
^[a-f0-9]{40}(:.+)?$
Hashcat Command (Mode: 190):
John the Ripper Command:
← Back to Hash Identifier

What is LinkedIn?

LinkedIn’s cryptographic hash format, initially deployed in 2012 as part of its password storage system, was a custom variant of the SHA-1 algorithm with a proprietary modification: it prepended a 12-byte salt derived from the user’s email address (hashed via SHA-1) to the password before hashing, resulting in a 20-byte (160-bit) output. The structure followed the pattern `SHA1(salt || password)`, where the salt was deterministic but not globally unique per user, instead tied to the email’s SHA-1 digest. This design aimed to mitigate rainbow table attacks by ensuring identical passwords yielded different hashes across users, though the salt’s derivation lacked cryptographic randomness. The primary use-case was secure password storage, but its adoption was short-lived due to subsequent vulnerabilities.

The format’s vulnerability stemmed from three critical flaws: (1) **predictable salts**—since salts were derived from email hashes, attackers could precompute hashes for common email domains, reducing the salt space’s entropy; (2) **SHA-1’s collision resistance degradation**—by 2012, SHA-1 was known to be vulnerable to length-extension attacks and had a reduced collision resistance (later exploited in 2017 by Google’s SHA-1 collision attack), enabling targeted hash forgeries; (3) **GPU/ASIC optimizations**—the deterministic salt structure allowed attackers to parallelize brute-force attacks (e.g., via GPU clusters) by grouping hashes by email domains, drastically reducing cracking time. Additionally, the absence of a per-user random salt meant that identical passwords across users produced hash patterns exploitable via pattern-matching techniques, further accelerating offline cracking.

Identifying LinkedIn Hashes

Identifying a hash blindly is often difficult because multiple algorithms can output strings of the exact same length. For example, a standard 32-character hexadecimal string could be MD5, NTLM, MD4, or LM. To definitively identify LinkedIn, security researchers analyze the hash against a strict regular expression (regex) signature (shown above) to find structural matches.

How to Crack LinkedIn

If you need to recover the plaintext password for a LinkedIn hash during a penetration test or forensics investigation, you must supply the correct module ID to your cracking software. Use the exact commands provided at the top of this page to target the hash successfully.