PDF 1.4 - 1.6 (Acrobat 5 - 8) Hash

Technical details, regex signatures, and cracking commands for the PDF 1.4 - 1.6 (Acrobat 5 - 8) algorithm.

Regex Identification Signature:
^\$pdf\$[24]\*[34]\*128\*[0-9-]{1,5}\*1\*(16|32)\*[a-f0-9]{32,64}\*32\*[a-f0-9]{64}\*(8|16|32)\*[a-f0-9]{16,64}$
Hashcat Command (Mode: 10500):
John the Ripper Command:
← Back to Hash Identifier

What is PDF 1.4 - 1.6 (Acrobat 5 - 8)?

The cryptographic hash format used in **PDF versions 1.4 through 1.6** (corresponding to Adobe Acrobat 5–8) is based on the **MD5 hash algorithm**, supplemented by a proprietary Adobe-specific wrapper for document integrity verification. Introduced in the late 1990s as part of Adobe’s PDF specification, this mechanism was designed to ensure file integrity by embedding a hash of the document’s contents into its metadata. The process involves computing an MD5 hash of the entire PDF byte stream (excluding certain metadata fields to prevent tampering with the hash itself), then encoding this hash in **base64** and embedding it within the document’s trailer dictionary under the `/PDFVersion` and `/Size` fields. While primarily intended for detecting accidental corruption or unauthorized modifications, this scheme was not originally conceived as a secure authentication or digital signature mechanism, relying instead on the assumption that MD5’s collision resistance would suffice for basic integrity checks.

The vulnerability of this system stems from **MD5’s inherent weaknesses**, particularly its susceptibility to **preimage and collision attacks**. By the mid-2000s, advancements in cryptanalysis (e.g., **Dual_EC_DRBG backdoors** and optimized collision-finding algorithms like **Hai Fu’s MD5 collision attacks**) rendered MD5 practically breakable, allowing adversaries to craft malicious PDFs with identical hashes to legitimate ones. Additionally, the absence of **salting** or **iterative hashing** (e.g., PBKDF2) in Adobe’s implementation enables **brute-force or rainbow table attacks** when combined with weak password protection (e.g., in encrypted PDFs). Furthermore, the **parallelizability of MD5** on modern GPUs and FPGA clusters (via optimized libraries like **CryptominSyS**) reduces the computational overhead of forging hashes, exacerbating the risk of **document spoofing**. Finally, Adobe’s reliance on MD5 for **digital signatures (via Adobe’s proprietary PKCS#7 wrapper)** further compounds the risk, as signature verification becomes trivial once a collision is found, undermining the entire integrity framework.

Identifying PDF 1.4 - 1.6 (Acrobat 5 - 8) Hashes

Identifying a hash blindly is often difficult because multiple algorithms can output strings of the exact same length. For example, a standard 32-character hexadecimal string could be MD5, NTLM, MD4, or LM. To definitively identify PDF 1.4 - 1.6 (Acrobat 5 - 8), security researchers analyze the hash against a strict regular expression (regex) signature (shown above) to find structural matches.

How to Crack PDF 1.4 - 1.6 (Acrobat 5 - 8)

If you need to recover the plaintext password for a PDF 1.4 - 1.6 (Acrobat 5 - 8) hash during a penetration test or forensics investigation, you must supply the correct module ID to your cracking software. Use the exact commands provided at the top of this page to target the hash successfully.