WebEdition CMS Hash

Technical details, regex signatures, and cracking commands for the WebEdition CMS algorithm.

Regex Identification Signature:
^[a-f0-9]{32}:[a-z0-9]+$
Hashcat Command (Mode: 3721):
Not supported natively by John the Ripper
← Back to Hash Identifier

What is WebEdition CMS?

The **WebEdition CMS** cryptographic hash format emerged in the mid-2000s as a proprietary extension of the MD5 algorithm, designed to secure user authentication and content integrity within early web-based content management systems (CMS) platforms. Structurally, it retains MD5’s 128-bit (32-character hexadecimal) output but introduces a non-standardized pre-processing step: the plaintext password is concatenated with a hardcoded "WebEdition CMS" prefix before hashing, followed by a fixed salt (e.g., a version number or site-specific token) embedded within the final hash string. This hybrid approach was intended to mitigate trivial rainbow table attacks by obfuscating the raw hash output, though it lacked formal cryptographic scrutiny. The primary use-case was lightweight authentication in legacy CMS environments where performance outweighed security concerns, particularly in scenarios where storage efficiency and compatibility with MD5-compatible tools were prioritized over modern cryptographic standards.

The **WebEdition CMS** format is critically vulnerable to cracking due to its reliance on MD5’s inherent weaknesses compounded by design flaws. The absence of per-user salting or adaptive work factors renders it susceptible to brute-force attacks, as modern GPU clusters (e.g., using tools like Hashcat) can evaluate millions of hashes per second. The fixed salt and predictable prefix enable precomputation of hash tables, while MD5’s collision resistance is insufficient for security—demonstrated by its use in the 2004 "MD5 collision attack" and later exploits like the 2017 NotPetya ransomware. Additionally, the format’s reliance on legacy hardware optimizations (e.g., SIMD instructions for MD5) allows attackers to exploit parallel processing gains, reducing cracking time to minutes for weak passwords. The lack of iterative hashing (e.g., bcrypt’s cost factor) further accelerates decryption, rendering it unsuitable for any security-sensitive application.

Identifying WebEdition CMS Hashes

Identifying a hash blindly is often difficult because multiple algorithms can output strings of the exact same length. For example, a standard 32-character hexadecimal string could be MD5, NTLM, MD4, or LM. To definitively identify WebEdition CMS, security researchers analyze the hash against a strict regular expression (regex) signature (shown above) to find structural matches.

How to Crack WebEdition CMS

If you need to recover the plaintext password for a WebEdition CMS hash during a penetration test or forensics investigation, you must supply the correct module ID to your cracking software. Use the exact commands provided at the top of this page to target the hash successfully.